Farrell v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
95 N.Y.S. 1128
Opinion
In our opinion the case should have gone to the jury. Under the circumstances as testified to by plaintiff and her daughter, it cannot be said as matter of law that plaintiff was negligent, or that defendant was free from negligence. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
GILDERSLEEVE, J., concurs. MacLEAN, J., taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farrell v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 95 N.Y.S. 1128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
95 N.Y.S. 1128 (Farrell v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.