Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Farrell v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

Farrell v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

95 N.Y.S. 1128
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 24, 1905
StatusPublished

This text of 95 N.Y.S. 1128 (Farrell v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farrell v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 95 N.Y.S. 1128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

SCOTT, P. J.

In our opinion the case should have gone to the jury. Under the circumstances as testified to by plaintiff and her daughter, it cannot be said as matter of law that plaintiff was negligent, or that defendant was free from negligence. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

GILDERSLEEVE, J., concurs. MacLEAN, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 N.Y.S. 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-interborough-rapid-transit-co-nyappterm-1905.