Farrell v. Holmes
7 R.I. Dec. 164
This text of 7 R.I. Dec. 164 (Farrell v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Farrell v. Holmes, 7 R.I. Dec. 164 (R.I. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Heard upon motion to dismiss action toy “amicus curiae.”
Writ served by special order of Court by registered mail which defendant refused to accept. Service is insufficient tout the Court is of the opinion the proper method is for defendant to enter appearance for the purpose of pleading in abatement as to jurisdiction.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 R.I. Dec. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-holmes-risuperct-1931.