Farrell v. Hill

23 N.Y.S. 402, 69 Hun 455, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 620
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 9, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 N.Y.S. 402 (Farrell v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farrell v. Hill, 23 N.Y.S. 402, 69 Hun 455, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 620 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

HERRICK, J.

I think this case should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements, on opinion of special term.

MAYHAM, P. J., concurs. PUTNAM, J., not acting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. McMahon
81 A.D. 324 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 N.Y.S. 402, 69 Hun 455, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-hill-nysupct-1893.