Farrell v. Hill
23 N.Y.S. 402, 69 Hun 455, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 620
Opinion
I think this case should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements, on opinion of special term.
MAYHAM, P. J., concurs. PUTNAM, J., not acting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farrell v. Hill, 23 N.Y.S. 402, 69 Hun 455, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 620 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
23 N.Y.S. 402 (Farrell v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. McMahon
81 A.D. 324 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)