Farrell v. Haeger

New York Court of Common Pleas

Farrell v. Haeger

36 N.Y.S. 1125, 15 Misc. 687, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 901

DecidedDecember 27, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.Y.S. 1125 (Farrell v. Haeger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farrell v. Haeger, 36 N.Y.S. 1125, 15 Misc. 687, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 901 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in these cases brings up for review questions of fact only. The judgment in both cases seems to he supported by evidence, and, although the evidence was contradicted by the respective defendants, it was peculiarly the province of the court having the witnesses before it to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given to their testimony. The judgment in each case should be affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in these cases brings up for review questions of fact only. The judgment in both cases seems to he supported by evidence, and, although the evidence was contradicted by the respective defendants, it was peculiarly the province of the court having the witnesses before it to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given to their testimony. The judgment in each case should be affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 N.Y.S. 1125, 15 Misc. 687, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-haeger-nyctcompl-1895.