Farrell v. Farrell

133 A.D.2d 530, 520 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50010
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 133 A.D.2d 530 (Farrell v. Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farrell v. Farrell, 133 A.D.2d 530, 520 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court correctly declined jurisdiction of petitioner’s custody application pursuant to the Federal Parental Kidnaping Prevention Act of 1980 (PKPA; 28 USC § 1738A). When the divorce action was commenced in Florida, that State was the home State of the child. Under its laws, Florida acquired jurisdiction to render a custody determination (see, Fla Stat Annot § 61.1308 [1] [a] [1]) and since the respondent continued to reside there, Florida continued to have jurisdiction to determine custody of the child of the marriage (28 USC § 1738A [d]). Under these circumstances, New York lacked jurisdiction to modify or supersede the Florida custody order (28 USC § 1738A [f]). Since the facts essential to consideration of jurisdiction under PKPA were not in dispute, a hearing was not required. Moreover, the jurisdictional provisions of PKPA preempt those of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA; Domestic Relations Law art 5-A) (Enslein v Enslein, 112 AD2d 973, 975) and, therefore, we do not reach the issue of whether a hearing was required to determine if New York should exercise jurisdiction under the UCCJA (Domestic Relations Law § 75-d). We also do not reach the issue of whether the Pennsylvania custody order, made in the course of an abuse proceeding, would constitute an additional basis for declining jurisdiction of this petition. (Appeal from order of Onondaga County Family Court, Bersani, J.— custody.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reis v. Zimmer
263 A.D.2d 136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Michael M. v. Tanya E.
256 A.D.2d 1137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Jackson-Ordia v. Ordia
224 A.D.2d 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Isabel M. v. Thomas M.
164 Misc. 2d 420 (NYC Family Court, 1995)
Koons v. Koons
161 Misc. 2d 842 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)
Croskey v. Taylor
183 A.D.2d 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Michael P. v. Diana G.
156 A.D.2d 59 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Pauzner v. Pauzner
143 Misc. 2d 358 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A.D.2d 530, 520 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-farrell-nyappdiv-1987.