Farrell v. Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farrell v. Farrell

57 A.D.2d 914, 395 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12155

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 57 A.D.2d 914 (Farrell v. Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farrell v. Farrell, 57 A.D.2d 914, 395 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12155 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which plaintiff had previously been awarded a judgment of divorce, she appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 12, 1976, as denied the branch of her motion which sought a prehearing examination of defendant-respondent, her former husband, and certain other named individuals, concerning his financial circumstances and (2) a further order of the same court, dated November 24, 1976 (amending an order of the same court dated November 15, 1976) as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated October 12, 1976 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order dated November 24, 1976 modified by striking therefrom the word "denied” and by substituting therefor provisions that, upon reargument, the said branch of the motion is granted only to the extent of permitting a prehearing examination of the defendant as to his income and financial circumstances, and requiring him to produce all books, records and documents relevant thereto, and that the motion is otherwise denied. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The prehearing examination of the defendant shall proceed at a time and place to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days to be given by the plaintiff, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. The time within which plaintiff may serve such notice is extended until 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. The plaintiff is entitled to a prehearing examination of the defendant concerning his present income and financial circumstances (see Domestic Relations Law, § 250; Grant v Grant, 84 Misc 2d 577). However, she is not entitled to examine the other individuals named in her order to show cause dated September 2, 1976. Cohalan, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which plaintiff had previously been awarded a judgment of divorce, she appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 12, 1976, as denied the branch of her motion which sought a prehearing examination of defendant-respondent, her former husband, and certain other named individuals, concerning his financial circumstances and (2) a further order of the same court, dated November 24, 1976 (amending an order of the same court dated November 15, 1976) as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated October 12, 1976 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order dated November 24, 1976 modified by striking therefrom the word "denied” and by substituting therefor provisions that, upon reargument, the said branch of the motion is granted only to the extent of permitting a prehearing examination of the defendant as to his income and financial circumstances, and requiring him to produce all books, records and documents relevant thereto, and that the motion is otherwise denied. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The prehearing examination of the defendant shall proceed at a time and place to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days to be given by the plaintiff, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. The time within which plaintiff may serve such notice is extended until 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. The plaintiff is entitled to a prehearing examination of the defendant concerning his present income and financial circumstances (see Domestic Relations Law, § 250; Grant v Grant, 84 Misc 2d 577). However, she is not entitled to examine the other individuals named in her order to show cause dated September 2, 1976. Cohalan, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 914, 395 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-farrell-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack