Farrell v. . City of Middletown

65 N.E. 1116, 172 N.Y. 666, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 824
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 9, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 65 N.E. 1116 (Farrell v. . City of Middletown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farrell v. . City of Middletown, 65 N.E. 1116, 172 N.Y. 666, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 824 (N.Y. 1902).

Opinion

Per Owriam.

We are of the opinion that the evidence presented a question of fact as to the negligence of the defendant, which the court should have submitted to the jury, and that it erred in nonsuiting the plaintiff upon that ground.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Logerto v. Central Building Co.
123 A.D. 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Walsh v. Continental Iron Works
124 A.D. 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 N.E. 1116, 172 N.Y. 666, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-city-of-middletown-ny-1902.