Farrell v. . City of Middletown
65 N.E. 1116, 172 N.Y. 666, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 824
Opinion
We are of the opinion that the evidence presented a question of fact as to the negligence of the defendant, which the court should have submitted to the jury, and that it erred in nonsuiting the plaintiff upon that ground.
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.
Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farrell v. . City of Middletown, 65 N.E. 1116, 172 N.Y. 666, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 824 (N.Y. 1902).
65 N.E. 1116 (Farrell v. . City of Middletown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Logerto v. Central Building Co.
123 A.D. 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Walsh v. Continental Iron Works
124 A.D. 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)