Farrell v. Bork
79 A. 897, 76 N.J. Eq. 615, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 261
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Learning in deciding the case in the court below.
[616] For affirmance—The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Reed, Tbenciiard, Bergeh, Voobhees, Minturn, Bogeet, Veedenbuegii, Geay, Dill, Cougdou—12.
For reversal—Garrison, Pabiceb, Vroom—3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farrell v. Bork, 79 A. 897, 76 N.J. Eq. 615, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 261 (N.J. 1910).
79 A. 897 (Farrell v. Bork) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chew v. DeVries
213 A.2d 742 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)
Bondarchuk v. Barber
38 A.2d 872 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Schefrin v. Wilensky
111 A. 660 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1920)
Brisbane v. Sullivan
93 A. 705 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1914)