Farrell v. Board of Education of the Carmel Central School District No. 2

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farrell v. Board of Education of the Carmel Central School District No. 2

46 A.D.2d 687, 361 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3811

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.2d 687 (Farrell v. Board of Education of the Carmel Central School District No. 2) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farrell v. Board of Education of the Carmel Central School District No. 2, 46 A.D.2d 687, 361 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul respondents’ determination terminating appellant’s employment, the appeal is from an order-judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, entered April 8,1974, which granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition on the ground of the expiration of the four-month Statute of Limitations (CPLR 217). Order-judgment reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and respondents’ motion denied, upon the authority of Matter of Wininger v. Williamson (46 A D 2d 689). Respondents’ time to answer the petition is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to- be made hereon. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Cohalan, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul respondents’ determination terminating appellant’s employment, the appeal is from an order-judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, entered April 8,1974, which granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition on the ground of the expiration of the four-month Statute of Limitations (CPLR 217). Order-judgment reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and respondents’ motion denied, upon the authority of Matter of Wininger v. Williamson (46 A D 2d 689). Respondents’ time to answer the petition is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to- be made hereon. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Cohalan, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 687, 361 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-board-of-education-of-the-carmel-central-school-district-no-2-nyappdiv-1974.