Farrell v. Board of Education
This text of 259 A.D. 906 (Farrell v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent Elizabeth Farrell, has recovered damages for personal injuries sustained when she stumbled and fell in a rounded depression or hole in the loose blue stone gravel covering the playground of a public school attended by her granddaughter; and her husband, Michael Farrell, has likewise recovered a judgment for loss of services and medical expenses. At the conclusion of the trial a motion was made to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence. Decision was reserved and thereafter the trial court in a memorandum stated that in his opinion the verdict was clearly against the weight of the evidence, but nevertheless denied the motion. An examination of the record establishes that the verdict is clearly against the weight of the believable, credible evidence. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 906, 20 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1940.