Farrell v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farrell v. Baker

115 A.D. 890, 101 N.Y.S. 1120

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D. 890 (Farrell v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farrell v. Baker, 115 A.D. 890, 101 N.Y.S. 1120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

The determination of these appeals must abide the event of the appeal being heard to-day by the Court of Appeals. If the decision in the first department is affirmed these orders must be reversed. If that decision is reversed these orders must be affirmed. If the Court of Appeals declines to determine the controversy on the merits, leaving the decision in the first department undisturbed, this court will- as matter of uniformity follow the decision of this court in its first department. No costs. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and Gaynor, JJ., concurred. Settle order before the presiding j ustice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The determination of these appeals must abide the event of the appeal being heard to-day by the Court of Appeals. If the decision in the first department is affirmed these orders must be reversed. If that decision is reversed these orders must be affirmed. If the Court of Appeals declines to determine the controversy on the merits, leaving the decision in the first department undisturbed, this court will- as matter of uniformity follow the decision of this court in its first department. No costs. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and Gaynor, JJ., concurred. Settle order before the presiding j ustice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D. 890, 101 N.Y.S. 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-baker-nyappdiv-1906.