Farrar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Farrar v. State

1918 OK CR 204, 177 P. 990, 15 Okla. Crim. 669, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 83

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 16, 1918·No. No. A-2972.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The plainl ffs in error. .Re Fa rar and Hugh McClure, were convicted at the January, 1917, term of the county court of. Canadian county on a cha:ge of conveying in’oxicacina liquor i'rom one place in said county to another place therein, and their punishment fixed at a fine of $500 each and imprisonment in the county jail for a period oi ix months cich. Ueon .arefill examination of the record we find no fundamental error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiffs in error. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The plainl ffs in error. .Re Fa rar and Hugh McClure, were convicted at the January, 1917, term of the county court of. Canadian county on a cha:ge of conveying in’oxicacina liquor i'rom one place in said county to another place therein, and their punishment fixed at a fine of $500 each and imprisonment in the county jail for a period oi ix months cich. Ueon .arefill examination of the record we find no fundamental error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiffs in error. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Farrar v. State, 1918 OK CR 204, 177 P. 990, 15 Okla. Crim. 669, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 83 (Okla. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

1918 OK CR 204 (Farrar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.