Farrar v. State
34 S.E. 288, 110 Ga. 256, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 502
This text of 34 S.E. 288 (Farrar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Farrar v. State, 34 S.E. 288, 110 Ga. 256, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 502 (Ga. 1899).
Opinion
Though the evidence was entirely circumstantial and not of the strongest and most satisfactory character, it was consistent with the guilt of the accused and sufficient to warrant the jury in concluding that it was inconsistent with any other reasonable hypothesis.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Moody v. State
189 S.E.2d 889 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Wheeler v. State
185 S.E.2d 900 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Norman v. State
175 S.E.2d 119 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Eason v. State
125 S.E.2d 488 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 S.E. 288, 110 Ga. 256, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrar-v-state-ga-1899.