Farrar & Strange v. Spencer Bros.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Farrar & Strange v. Spencer Bros.

127 So. 410, 13 La. App. 136, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 552

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 10, 1930

DocketNo. 2717

StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 410 (Farrar & Strange v. Spencer Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farrar & Strange v. Spencer Bros., 127 So. 410, 13 La. App. 136, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 552 (La. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

DREW, J.

The record in this case contains only the petition, answer, an itemized statement of the account sued on, the citation and return thereon, and the judgment of the lower court in favor of the plaintiff for the amount sued for and reserving to the defendant the right to proceed against J. E. Farrar in a separate action and rejecting the reconventional demand of defendant in this suit.

There is no evidence in the record, and there was no argument of the case by appellant’s counsel and neither has he filed a brief in the case.

The lower court is presumed to have had sufficient evidence before it on which to base its judgment, and there are no errors in that part of the record before us.

Therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DREW, J.

The record in this case contains only the petition, answer, an itemized statement of the account sued on, the citation and return thereon, and the judgment of the lower court in favor of the plaintiff for the amount sued for and reserving to the defendant the right to proceed against J. E. Farrar in a separate action and rejecting the reconventional demand of defendant in this suit.

There is no evidence in the record, and there was no argument of the case by appellant’s counsel and neither has he filed a brief in the case.

The lower court is presumed to have had sufficient evidence before it on which to base its judgment, and there are no errors in that part of the record before us.

Therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 So. 410, 13 La. App. 136, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrar-strange-v-spencer-bros-lactapp-1930.