Farrar Lumber Co. v. Burkhart

131 S.E. 128, 34 Ga. App. 776, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 18
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 12, 1926
Docket16922
StatusPublished

This text of 131 S.E. 128 (Farrar Lumber Co. v. Burkhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farrar Lumber Co. v. Burkhart, 131 S.E. 128, 34 Ga. App. 776, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 18 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, 0.-J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial (several of which are too defective and incomplete to be considered) show cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. F. K. McOutchen, for plaintiff in error. Maddox, Maddox & Mitchell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.E. 128, 34 Ga. App. 776, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrar-lumber-co-v-burkhart-gactapp-1926.