Farrar Lumber Co. v. Andrews Co.

103 S.E. 494, 150 Ga. 252, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 129
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1920
DocketNos. 1727, 1728
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 494 (Farrar Lumber Co. v. Andrews Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farrar Lumber Co. v. Andrews Co., 103 S.E. 494, 150 Ga. 252, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 129 (Ga. 1920).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The judge did not abuse Ms discretion in refusing an interlocutory injunction, nor in requiring a bond of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed on both bills of exceptions.

All the Justices concur. Q. D. McGutchen, F. K. McGutchen, and J. G. B. Erwin, for plaintiffs. Maddox, McGamy & Shumate and Allison, Lynch & Phillips, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kent v. Lane
147 S.E. 61 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 494, 150 Ga. 252, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrar-lumber-co-v-andrews-co-ga-1920.