Farrar Lumber Co. v. Andrews Co.
103 S.E. 494, 150 Ga. 252, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 129
Opinion
The judge did not abuse Ms discretion in refusing an interlocutory injunction, nor in requiring a bond of the defendant.
Judgment affirmed on both bills of exceptions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farrar Lumber Co. v. Andrews Co., 103 S.E. 494, 150 Ga. 252, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 129 (Ga. 1920).
103 S.E. 494 (Farrar Lumber Co. v. Andrews Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kent v. Lane
147 S.E. 61 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)