Farrakhan v. State

359 F.3d 1116
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 2004
DocketNo. 01-35032
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 359 F.3d 1116 (Farrakhan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farrakhan v. State, 359 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 2004).

Opinions

Order: Dissent by

Judge KOZINSKI.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrakhan v. Washington
359 F.3d 1116 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 F.3d 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrakhan-v-state-ca9-2004.