Farrakhan v. State
359 F.3d 1116
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2004·No. No. 01-35032·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
Order: Dissent by
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farrakhan v. State, 359 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 2004).
359 F.3d 1116 (Farrakhan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Javidi v. Superior Court, Family Court Contra Costa County
N.D. California, 2022
Farrakhan v. Washington
359 F.3d 1116 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)