Farrakhan v. Gregoire

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Farrakhan v. Gregoire. Read the opinion of the Court — 590 F.3d 989
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2010·No. 06-35669·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MUHAMMAD SHABAZZ FARRAKHAN,  aka Ernest S. Walker; AL-KAREEM SHADEED; MARCUS X. PRICE; RAMON BARRIENTES; TIMOTHY No. 06-35669 SCHAAF; CLIFTON BRICENO, Plaintiffs-Appellants,  D.C. No. CV-96-00076-RHW v. ORDER CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE; SAM REED; HAROLD W. CLARKE; STATE OF WASHINGTON, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed April 28, 2010

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farrakhan v. Gregoire, (9th Cir. 2010).

Farrakhan v. Gregoire (Farrakhan v. Gregoire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.