Farragut Gardens No. 1, Inc. v. Boyland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farragut Gardens No. 1, Inc. v. Boyland

279 A.D. 913, 110 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5290

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 1952·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Such an assessment is not illegal, but erroneous, and a review thereof requires compliance with the provisions of the New York City Charter, the Administrative Code and the Tax Law, which provide an adequate and exclusive remedy. (People ex rel. Soeurbee, Inc., v. Purdy, 179 App. Div. 748, affd. 222 N. Y. 657; Sikora Realty Corp. v. City of New York, 262 N. Y. 312; People ex rel. Harway Improvement Co. v. Berry, 139 Misc. 614, affd. 233 App. Div. 851, 865, affd. 258 N. Y. 590.) The procedure adopted by appellant has no basis in law. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ. [See post, p. 1078.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Such an assessment is not illegal, but erroneous, and a review thereof requires compliance with the provisions of the New York City Charter, the Administrative Code and the Tax Law, which provide an adequate and exclusive remedy. (People ex rel. Soeurbee, Inc., v. Purdy, 179 App. Div. 748, affd. 222 N. Y. 657; Sikora Realty Corp. v. City of New York, 262 N. Y. 312; People ex rel. Harway Improvement Co. v. Berry, 139 Misc. 614, affd. 233 App. Div. 851, 865, affd. 258 N. Y. 590.) The procedure adopted by appellant has no basis in law. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ. [See post, p. 1078.]

Farragut Gardens No. 1, Inc. v. Boyland, 279 A.D. 913, 110 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5290 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

279 A.D. 913 (Farragut Gardens No. 1, Inc. v. Boyland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related