Farr v. Stroud

Missouri Court of Appeals

Farr v. Stroud

579 S.W.3d 260

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 2019·No. No. ED 106692·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Keith Stroud and Althea Stroud, acting pro se, appeal the judgment entered after a bench trial in favor of Matthew Farr and Katie Farr ("Landlords") as to Landlords' claim for unlawful detainer. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*261The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Keith Stroud and Althea Stroud, acting pro se, appeal the judgment entered after a bench trial in favor of Matthew Farr and Katie Farr ("Landlords") as to Landlords' claim for unlawful detainer. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*261The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Farr v. Stroud, 579 S.W.3d 260 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

579 S.W.3d 260 (Farr v. Stroud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.