Farr v. Stroud

Missouri Court of Appeals

Farr v. Stroud

579 S.W.3d 260

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 7, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106692

StatusPublished

This text of 579 S.W.3d 260 (Farr v. Stroud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farr v. Stroud, 579 S.W.3d 260 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Keith Stroud and Althea Stroud, acting pro se, appeal the judgment entered after a bench trial in favor of Matthew Farr and Katie Farr ("Landlords") as to Landlords' claim for unlawful detainer. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*261The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Keith Stroud and Althea Stroud, acting pro se, appeal the judgment entered after a bench trial in favor of Matthew Farr and Katie Farr ("Landlords") as to Landlords' claim for unlawful detainer. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*261The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

579 S.W.3d 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farr-v-stroud-moctapp-2019.