Farr v. Board of Adjustment
337 S.E.2d 581, 315 N.C. 309, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 2088
Opinion
Our review of the decision of the Court of Appeals reveals that the case was decided by that court on the basis of the principle of “prior non-conforming use,” an issue not raised or briefed by the parties to this action and not supported by the record. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the. [310]*310case is remanded to that court for further consideration of the issues raised by the appellant in her brief filed in the Court of Appeals.
Vacated and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farr v. Board of Adjustment, 337 S.E.2d 581, 315 N.C. 309, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 2088 (N.C. 1985).
337 S.E.2d 581 (Farr v. Board of Adjustment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farr v. Bd. of Adjustment of Rocky Mount
349 S.E.2d 576 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)