Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co. v. Ringwalt Linoleum Works

D.C. Circuit

Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co. v. Ringwalt Linoleum Works

46 App. D.C. 69, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2506

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 1917

DocketNos. 1058 to 1063

StatusPublished

This text of 46 App. D.C. 69 (Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co. v. Ringwalt Linoleum Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co. v. Ringwalt Linoleum Works, 46 App. D.C. 69, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2506 (D.C. Cir. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Robb

delivered the opinion of the Court:

These appeals involve substantially- the same facts that were involved in the case just decided, ante, 64, and were to abide the decision therein. The decision in each case, therefore, will be reversed. Reversed.

Mr. Justice Gould, of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, sat with the Court in the bearing and determination of this appeal, in the place of Mr. Chief Justice Shepard.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Robb

delivered the opinion of the Court:

These appeals involve substantially- the same facts that were involved in the case just decided, ante, 64, and were to abide the decision therein. The decision in each case, therefore, will be reversed. Reversed.

Mr. Justice Gould, of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, sat with the Court in the bearing and determination of this appeal, in the place of Mr. Chief Justice Shepard.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 App. D.C. 69, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farr-bailey-manufacturing-co-v-ringwalt-linoleum-works-cadc-1917.