Farquharson v. Lightner
131 P. 154, 89 Kan. 445
This text of 131 P. 154 (Farquharson v. Lightner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Farquharson v. Lightner, 131 P. 154, 89 Kan. 445 (kan 1913).
Opinion
The order of the district court granting a new trial is affirmed in accordance with the well-settled rule. (Murray v. Railway Co., 87 Kan. 750, 125 Pac. 45; Putnam v. King, 87 Kan. 842, 126 Pac. 1093; Bourquin v. Railway Co., 88 Kan. 183, 127 Pac. 770; and cases cited in these opinions.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Murray v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
125 P. 45 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1912)
Putnam Investment Co. v. King
126 P. 1093 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1912)
Bourquin v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
127 P. 770 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
131 P. 154, 89 Kan. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farquharson-v-lightner-kan-1913.