Farquharson v. Citibank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Farquharson v. Citibank

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 5, 2017

Docket5D16-2687

StatusPublished

This text of Farquharson v. Citibank (Farquharson v. Citibank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farquharson v. Citibank, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED EARLTON FARQUHARSON AND BEULAH FARQUHARSON,

Appellants,

v. Case No. 5D16-2687

CITIBANK, N.A. FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFCATE HOLDERS CWABS, INC. ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATE SERIES 2007-QX1,

Appellee. ________________________________/

Opinion filed June 9, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Kevin B. Weiss, Judge.

Earlton Farquharson and Beulah Farquharson, Buenaventura Lakes, pro se.

Sara F. Holladay-Tobias, Emily Y. Rottmann, Ada A. Hammond and Jason R. Bowyer, of McGuireWoods LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After carefully reviewing the record on appeal, the hearing transcript, and the

parties’ briefs, we affirm the lower court, whom we commend for showing great patience

in the manner in which the August 2, 2016, hearing was conducted.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., EVANDER, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI