Faroll v. National Surety Corp.

13 A.D.2d 952, 216 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 27, 1961·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, entered on November 23, 1960, granting plaintiffs’ motion to strike five complete and one partial defense from defendant’s answer to the amended complaint, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts to the extent of reinstating the partial defense, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The five separate' complete defenses were properly Stricken from the answer. The matters alleged therein may be proved under the general denials in the pleading. Special Term erred, however, in granting the motion to strike the partial defense. It might develop at the trial that the partial defense is sufficient. We pass upon no other question or issue. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faroll v. National Surety Corp., 13 A.D.2d 952, 216 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

13 A.D.2d 952 (Faroll v. National Surety Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warner v. Levinson
188 A.D.2d 268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Gold v. Swiss Air Transportation Co.
33 A.D.2d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)