Faro v. Transamerica Insurance
425 N.E.2d 896, 54 N.Y.2d 647, 442 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2608
This text of 425 N.E.2d 896 (Faro v. Transamerica Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Faro v. Transamerica Insurance, 425 N.E.2d 896, 54 N.Y.2d 647, 442 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2608 (N.Y. 1981).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said that the arbitrator’s award was without basis in the evidence or was not otherwise grounded in reason (see Matter of Furstenberg [Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.], 49 NY2d 757).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Waghtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Prainito v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
91 A.D.2d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
425 N.E.2d 896, 54 N.Y.2d 647, 442 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faro-v-transamerica-insurance-ny-1981.