Faro v. Transamerica Insurance
425 N.E.2d 896, 54 N.Y.2d 647, 442 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2608
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said that the arbitrator’s award was without basis in the evidence or was not otherwise grounded in reason (see Matter of Furstenberg [Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.], 49 NY2d 757).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Waghtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Faro v. Transamerica Insurance, 425 N.E.2d 896, 54 N.Y.2d 647, 442 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2608 (N.Y. 1981).
425 N.E.2d 896 (Faro v. Transamerica Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prainito v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
91 A.D.2d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)