Faro v. Matal
This text of Faro v. Matal (Faro v. Matal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
JOHN H. FARO, Petitioner-Appellant
v.
JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, Respondent-Appellee ______________________
2016-2716 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:16-cv-00320-GBL- TCB, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOHN H. FARO, Faro & Associates, Miami, FL, argued pro se.
ANDREW SUN HAN, Office of the United States Attor- ney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, VA, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by DANA J. BOENTE. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, PLAGER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 4, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Faro v. Matal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faro-v-matal-cafc-2017.