FARNWORTH v. State

34 So. 3d 251, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7312, 2010 WL 2076969
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 2010·No. 4D09-1602·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Farnworth appeals the trial court’s order that summarily denied his rule 3.850 motion. Three of the points were denied “without prejudice.” Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007). However, the order provided that Farnworth had thirty days to file an appeal. No provision was made to permit an amended filing.

We reverse the order on appeal and remand for the entry of a non-final order that gives Mr. Farnworth reasonable time to attempt to amend those points. See Lawrence v. State, 987 So.2d 157 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). Should Farnworth fail to *252 amend, the trial court may enter a final order disposing of all claims.

Reversed and remanded.

POLEN, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FARNWORTH v. State, 34 So. 3d 251, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7312, 2010 WL 2076969 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

34 So. 3d 251 (FARNWORTH v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coratello v. State
132 So. 3d 353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)