Farnsworth v. State
This text of 2013 Ark. 484 (Farnsworth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2013 Ark. 484
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-13-631
Opinion Delivered November 21, 2013
APPELLEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS TERRY FARNSWORTH APPEAL [WHITE COUNTY CIRCUIT APPELLANT COURT, 73CR-10-213, 73CR-10-248, HON. ROBERT EDWARDS, JUDGE] v.
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE MOTION GRANTED.
PER CURIAM
On July 19, 2013, appellant Terry Farnsworth lodged an appeal in this court from a
circuit court order that had dismissed his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of
jurisdiction. The appellee State now asks that the appeal be dismissed for appellant’s failure to
submit a brief.
Appellant was informed that his brief-in-chief was due here no later than August 28,
2013. As of the date of this opinion, he has not tendered a brief or filed a motion to file a
belated brief. He has taken no action to pursue the appeal.
Failure of an appellant who is acting pro se to file a brief in an appeal is cause for
dismissal of an appeal. Butler v. Hobbs, 2012 Ark. 162 (per curiam); Barker v. Hobbs, 2011 Ark.
420 (per curiam); Ingold v. State, 2009 Ark. 611 (per curiam); see also Vickers v. State, 2009 Ark. 585
(per curiam); Pineda v. State, 2009 Ark. 554 (per curiam).
Motion granted.
Terry Farnsworth, pro se petitioner.
Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ark. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnsworth-v-state-ark-2013.