Farnsworth v. Magnet, Inc.
This text of 879 S.W.2d 798 (Farnsworth v. Magnet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s award is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Johnson v. City of Duenweg Fire Dept., 735 S.W.2d 364, 366 (Mo. banc 1987). An extended opinion would not have precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
879 S.W.2d 798, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1208, 1994 WL 384705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnsworth-v-magnet-inc-moctapp-1994.