Farnsworth v. Magnet, Inc.

879 S.W.2d 798, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1208, 1994 WL 384705
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 26, 1994
DocketNo. 65636
StatusPublished

This text of 879 S.W.2d 798 (Farnsworth v. Magnet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farnsworth v. Magnet, Inc., 879 S.W.2d 798, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1208, 1994 WL 384705 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s award is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Johnson v. City of Duenweg Fire Dept., 735 S.W.2d 364, 366 (Mo. banc 1987). An extended opinion would not have precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. City of Duenweg Fire Department
735 S.W.2d 364 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
879 S.W.2d 798, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1208, 1994 WL 384705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnsworth-v-magnet-inc-moctapp-1994.