Farnsworth v. Macreadie

99 A. 455, 115 Me. 507, 1916 Me. LEXIS 115
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedDecember 26, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 99 A. 455 (Farnsworth v. Macreadie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farnsworth v. Macreadie, 99 A. 455, 115 Me. 507, 1916 Me. LEXIS 115 (Me. 1916).

Opinion

Savage, C. J.

Trespass quare clausum. The defendants were, at the time of the alleged trespass, the selectmen of the town of Cape Elizabeth. The trespass complained of consisted in removing a fence which the plaintiff had erected in Ottawa Park in Cape Elizabeth. The defendants seek to justify on the ground that the fence was an obstruction in Sea View avenue, a public way. The plaintiff contends that the land where the fence was, was not within the avenue, but was his private property. This statement presents the issue. The case comes before this court on" report.

The title of the plaintiff is not directly involved, because as we understand the record it is admitted that the plaintiff had such- possession of the locus as would entitle him to maintain an action of trespass against one who should invade his possession without right. Nevertheless a brief statement of the situation of the parties as to title will throw some light upon the merits of the controversy.

The record is not clear as to the origin of title. But we assume, as counsel have done in argument, that the territory known as Ottawa Park was once owned by the Ottawa Park Company, and that afterwards the title to some part of it, at least, including the locus in quo, came to one ‘Dalton. The plaintiff claims under Dalton. First, through deeds from Dalton and the Park Company to one Stanley, in 1906, and a deed from Stanley to himself, dated January 5, 1914; secondly, through a deed from Dalton, in which the Ottawa Park'Company joined as grantor, dated June 5, 1914.

It appears that in 1899, the Ottawa Park Company, then owner, caused the Ottawa Park Tract to be platted into lots, streets, avenues, and so forth, and a plan thereof to be recorded in the proper registry of deeds. One of the avenues delineated on the plan was Sea View avenue. The following sketch shows approximately so much of the plan as is material to this case. In the sketch we have indicated the corners of the tract now in dispute by the letters abed. The fence in question was erected between points a and b.

[509]*509

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vachon v. Inhabitants of the Town of Lisbon
295 A.2d 255 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1972)
Bradstreet v. Bradstreet
180 A.2d 459 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1962)
Clifford L. Swan Co. v. Dean
118 A.2d 890 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1955)
Shaw v. McKenzie
160 A. 911 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A. 455, 115 Me. 507, 1916 Me. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnsworth-v-macreadie-me-1916.