Farnsworth v. Com.

613 S.E.2d 459, 270 Va. 1, 2005 Va. LEXIS 63
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedJune 9, 2005
DocketRecord 042158.
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 613 S.E.2d 459 (Farnsworth v. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farnsworth v. Com., 613 S.E.2d 459, 270 Va. 1, 2005 Va. LEXIS 63 (Va. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, we review a judgment of the Court of Appeals of Virginia affirming a circuit court judgment convicting Samuel L. Farnsworth of knowingly and intentionally possessing a firearm after being convicted of a felony in the Commonwealth or in any other state, in violation of Code § 18.2-308.2. Farnsworth v. Commonwealth, 43 Va.App. 490 , 599 S.E.2d 482 (2004). Farnsworth had been previously convicted of a felony, armed robbery, in West Virginia in 1979. Upon completing his sentence in 1985, he received a document from the West Virginia Department of Corrections stating, "Any and all civil rights heretofore forfeited are restored. DONE this the 18th day of April, 1985." The issue on appeal is whether Farnsworth's possession of a firearm in Virginia violated Code § 18.2-308.2 even though the state of West Virginia had restored his civil rights.

The Court of Appeals held that Code § 18.2-308.2 is "plain and unambiguous and clearly manifests the legislature's intent to prohibit those who have been convicted of a felony under the law of, inter alia, any state in the United States, including West Virginia, from possessing a firearm in Virginia." Id. at 497 , 599 S.E.2d at 486 . The provisions of Code § 18.2-308.2 set forth two exemptions that allow a convicted felon to lawfully possess a firearm in Virginia. The first exemption applies to "`any' felon who has had his `political disabilities' removed by the Governor `pursuant to Article V, Section 12 of the Virginia Constitution.' " Id. at 498, 599 S.E.2d at 486 ; Code § 18.2-308.2(B)(iii). The second exemption allows "`any' felon whose `civil rights have been restored by the Governor or other appropriate authority'" to petition the circuit court of the jurisdiction where the felon resides for a permit to possess a firearm. Farnsworth, 43 Va.App. at 498 , 599 S.E.2d at 486 ; Code § 18.2-308.2(C). The Court of Appeals found that "Farnsworth did not obtain relief under either of these statutory exemptions." Farnsworth, 43 Va.App. at 498 , 599 S.E.2d at 486 .

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm that court's judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jonathan Lee Strickler v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2025
Christina Martinka v. PHI Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2024
Thomas Edward Clark v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2023
Jordan Darrell Morris v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2022
State v. Evans
343 P.3d 122 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2015)
Shawnda I. Rush v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2014
Rodriguez v. Virginia
87 Va. Cir. 56 (Fairfax County Circuit Court, 2013)
Kenneth A. Stokes, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
736 S.E.2d 330 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2013)
Vanover v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia, 2012
Perry v. Commonwealth
712 S.E.2d 765 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2011)
King v. Commonwealth
670 S.E.2d 767 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2009)
Seguna v. Maketa
181 P.3d 399 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2008)
Alston v. Commonwealth
637 S.E.2d 344 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
613 S.E.2d 459, 270 Va. 1, 2005 Va. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnsworth-v-com-va-2005.