Farnsworth v. Boe

W.D. Washington

Farnsworth v. Boe

DecidedApril 27, 2020

Docket3:20-cv-05067

StatusUnknown

This text of Farnsworth v. Boe (Farnsworth v. Boe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farnsworth v. Boe, (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 CHARLES V. FARNSWORTH, CASE NO. 3:20-cv-05067-BHS-JRC 11 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED 12 v. REQUEST FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE 13 JERI BOE, 14 Respondent. 15 16 This matter is before the Court on petitioner’s motion to stay, to which respondent states 17 that he has no opposition. See Dkts. 6, 10. 18 According to petitioner, proceedings regarding one of his personal restraint petitions are 19 pending in Washington State Supreme Court and raise at least three of his grounds for review. 20 See Dkt. 1. Because petitioner is in the process of exhausting certain of his grounds and because 21 respondent has no objection to the stay (see Dkt. 10, at 2), the Court will grant petitioner’s 22 request for a stay and abeyance of this matter. See Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 275–79 23 (2005). 24 1 The stay in this matter shall lift 30 days after the mandate is issued in the state court on 2 the personal restraint petition. Petitioner shall file a status report June 26, 2020 informing the 3 Court of the status of his personal restraint petition. 4 Dated this 27th day of April, 2020.

6 A 7 J. Richard Creatura 8 United States Magistrate Judge

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 CHARLES V. FARNSWORTH, CASE NO. 3:20-cv-05067-BHS-JRC 11 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED 12 v. REQUEST FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE 13 JERI BOE, 14 Respondent. 15 16 This matter is before the Court on petitioner’s motion to stay, to which respondent states 17 that he has no opposition. See Dkts. 6, 10. 18 According to petitioner, proceedings regarding one of his personal restraint petitions are 19 pending in Washington State Supreme Court and raise at least three of his grounds for review. 20 See Dkt. 1. Because petitioner is in the process of exhausting certain of his grounds and because 21 respondent has no objection to the stay (see Dkt. 10, at 2), the Court will grant petitioner’s 22 request for a stay and abeyance of this matter. See Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 275–79 23 (2005). 24 1 The stay in this matter shall lift 30 days after the mandate is issued in the state court on 2 the personal restraint petition. Petitioner shall file a status report June 26, 2020 informing the 3 Court of the status of his personal restraint petition. 4 Dated this 27th day of April, 2020.

6 A 7 J. Richard Creatura 8 United States Magistrate Judge

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Farnsworth v. Boe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnsworth-v-boe-wawd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack