Farnorotto v. Rosenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farnorotto v. Rosenthal

27 A.D.2d 595, 275 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2784

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 595 (Farnorotto v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farnorotto v. Rosenthal, 27 A.D.2d 595, 275 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Plaintiff in a negligence action recovered $5,500 for her pain and suffering, some slight disfigurement resulting from a forehead laceration not well depicted by the record and relatively minor loss of flexion and extension following a condylar fracture of the humerus requiring three weeks’ hospitalization for traction. Plaintiff appeals on the ground of inadequacy. While the proof would doubtless have warranted a substantially larger verdict, the award was not so low as to be shocking and we cannot, upon this record, disturb the jury’s evaluation of the injuries. Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Plaintiff in a negligence action recovered $5,500 for her pain and suffering, some slight disfigurement resulting from a forehead laceration not well depicted by the record and relatively minor loss of flexion and extension following a condylar fracture of the humerus requiring three weeks’ hospitalization for traction. Plaintiff appeals on the ground of inadequacy. While the proof would doubtless have warranted a substantially larger verdict, the award was not so low as to be shocking and we cannot, upon this record, disturb the jury’s evaluation of the injuries. Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 595, 275 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnorotto-v-rosenthal-nyappdiv-1966.