Farnham v. Scott

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 529
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 529 (Farnham v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farnham v. Scott, 30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 529 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide event. Held, that as between the plaintiff and her brother, Owen Henderson, the execution of the assignment of the mortgage, after she became of age, was not a ratification of the deed which she executed to him in her minority, and that as there is no evidence that the defendant paid value for the land, or that he acted upon, was influenced by, or knew of the fact of such assignment when he took his deed, he is in no better position than his grantor, the said Owen Henderson, and the plaintiff’s said deed and her alleged ratification thereof constitute no bar to her title.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnham-v-scott-nysupct-1881.