Farnham v. Kittinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farnham v. Kittinger

168 A.D.2d 923

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1990

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A.D.2d 923 (Farnham v. Kittinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farnham v. Kittinger, 168 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from order, insofar as it reserved decision on defendants’ motions for summary [924]*924judgment, unanimously dismissed, and order otherwise affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Cobb v Kittinger ([appeal No. 1] 168 AD2d 923 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J. —summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from order, insofar as it reserved decision on defendants’ motions for summary [924]*924judgment, unanimously dismissed, and order otherwise affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Cobb v Kittinger ([appeal No. 1] 168 AD2d 923 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J. —summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D.2d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnham-v-kittinger-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack