Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Farngiamore v. State

Farngiamore v. State

633 So. 2d 118, 1994 WL 84185
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 1994·No. 94-182·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

633 So.2d 118 (1994)

Gary R. FARNGIAMORE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 94-182.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 18, 1994.

Gary R. Farngiamore, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner claims he did not receive a copy of the order denying his Rule 3.850 motion. The record reflects that the certificate of the clerk of court did not comply with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(g). Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall file his notice of appeal with the clerk of the trial court within thirty days from the date hereof.

PETITION GRANTED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farngiamore v. State, 633 So. 2d 118, 1994 WL 84185 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

633 So. 2d 118 (Farngiamore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. State
693 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Guzman v. State
651 So. 2d 1320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Jones v. State
642 So. 2d 121 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)