Farngiamore v. State
This text of 633 So. 2d 118 (Farngiamore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gary R. FARNGIAMORE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Gary R. Farngiamore, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner claims he did not receive a copy of the order denying his Rule 3.850 motion. The record reflects that the certificate of the clerk of court did not comply with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(g). Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall file his notice of appeal with the clerk of the trial court within thirty days from the date hereof.
PETITION GRANTED.
PETERSON, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
633 So. 2d 118, 1994 WL 84185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farngiamore-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.