FARNET v. Perez
31 So. 3d 376, 2010 WL 1568512
Opinion
S. Stewart FARNET
v.
August PEREZ, III, Cheryl Perez, Perez, Ernst & Farnet Architects & Engineers, APC, PEF Engineering, Inc. and PEF Development Services, Inc.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
*377 Granted. We find there was "activity" in the appeal within the last three years for purposes of Rule 20 of the Local Rules of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. See Lee v. Commodore Holdings, Ltd., 00-1551 (La.App. 4 Cir. 12/29/05), 931 So.2d 1092. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and relator's appeal is reinstated.
KNOLL, J., would deny.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
FARNET v. Perez, 31 So. 3d 376, 2010 WL 1568512 (La. 2010).
31 So. 3d 376 (FARNET v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lee v. Commodore Holdings, Ltd.
931 So. 2d 1092 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)