Farnell v. . Tipper

Court of King's Bench

Farnell v. . Tipper

1 N.C. 692

DecidedJuly 5, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 692 (Farnell v. . Tipper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farnell v. . Tipper, 1 N.C. 692 (kingsbench 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

In this case it was shown to the court that the defendant was dead, and one who was counsel for the defendant prayed judgment nunc pro tunc, and it was said by the court that if the continuances were entered on the rolls, then no judgment could be given, but if no continuance were entered the party could have judgment; and if anyone, as amicus curiae, will inform that the party is dead, it ought to be shown to the court by plea and not by verbal information.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this case it was shown to the court that the defendant was dead, and one who was counsel for the defendant prayed judgment nunc pro tunc, and it was said by the court that if the continuances were entered on the rolls, then no judgment could be given, but if no continuance were entered the party could have judgment; and if anyone, as amicus curiae, will inform that the party is dead, it ought to be shown to the court by plea and not by verbal information.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnell-v-tipper-kingsbench-1793.