Farnell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Farnell v. State

141 So. 3d 695, 2014 WL 2862582, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9558

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 2014

DocketNo. 4D13-1858

StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 3d 695 (Farnell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farnell v. State, 141 So. 3d 695, 2014 WL 2862582, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9558 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lorenzo Edward Farnell appeals the convictions and sentences imposed after he entered an open no contest plea to several drug offenses in three lower tribunal cases. While the appeal was pending, he filed a rule 3.800(b) motion to correct sentencing errors, which the trial court granted. One of the errors was that he was awarded 441 days of jail time credit for each of two counts in L.T. case no. 562012CF362A, but was entitled to 443 days. The trial court entered an amended sentence for count II (which also required another correction), but omitted to enter an amended sentence for count I.

Farnell’s assistant public defender filed a motion to withdraw and supporting brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), pointing out the omission.

We affirm the convictions and the sentences, but we remand with the direction [696]*696that the trial court enter an amended sentence for count I of L.T. case no. 562012CF362A, reflecting an award of 443 days of jail time credit.

Affirmed and Remanded with Instructions.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., WARNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lorenzo Edward Farnell appeals the convictions and sentences imposed after he entered an open no contest plea to several drug offenses in three lower tribunal cases. While the appeal was pending, he filed a rule 3.800(b) motion to correct sentencing errors, which the trial court granted. One of the errors was that he was awarded 441 days of jail time credit for each of two counts in L.T. case no. 562012CF362A, but was entitled to 443 days. The trial court entered an amended sentence for count II (which also required another correction), but omitted to enter an amended sentence for count I.

Farnell’s assistant public defender filed a motion to withdraw and supporting brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), pointing out the omission.

We affirm the convictions and the sentences, but we remand with the direction [696]*696that the trial court enter an amended sentence for count I of L.T. case no. 562012CF362A, reflecting an award of 443 days of jail time credit.

Affirmed and Remanded with Instructions.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., WARNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 So. 3d 695, 2014 WL 2862582, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnell-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack