FARNAN v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

FARNAN v. State

309 S.W.3d 836, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 184, 2010 WL 605295

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

DocketWD 69921

StatusPublished

This text of 309 S.W.3d 836 (FARNAN v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

FARNAN v. State, 309 S.W.3d 836, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 184, 2010 WL 605295 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Michael Farnan appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Michael Farnan appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 S.W.3d 836, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 184, 2010 WL 605295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnan-v-state-moctapp-2010.