Farnan & Seemann, Inc. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 392, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1777
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 19, 1965
DocketNo. 69444; protests 63/10489 and 63/11731 (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished

This text of 55 Cust. Ct. 392 (Farnan & Seemann, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farnan & Seemann, Inc. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 392, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1777 (cusc 1965).

Opinion

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise described as Sunset lens brushes or Sunset lipstick lens brushes is not an article designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about the person, but is, in fact, a brush, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 Cust. Ct. 392, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnan-seemann-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1965.