Farmington River Watershed Ass'n v. Pac

550 A.2d 1101, 17 Conn. App. 165, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 471
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided December 13, 1988·No. 6486·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is controlled by Donis v. Board of Examiners in Podiatry, 207 Conn. 674, 542 A.2d 726 (1988). In Donis, the Supreme Court held that the department of health services was a party of record to the administrative proceeding and was therefore required to be cited and served as a defendant in the appeal. In this case, the only “service” upon the department of health services was personal service to a planning analyst. Moreover, that service was beyond the thirty day statutory period. This is improper service upon the department, who was a party of record within the meaning of General Statutes § 4-183 (b). The appeal provisions of General Statutes § 4-183 are jurisdictional in nature, and, if not complied with, render the appeal subject to dismissal. Donis v. Board of Examiners in Podiatry, supra, 683. The trial court did not err in granting the motion to dismiss the appeal.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmington River Watershed Ass'n v. Pac, 550 A.2d 1101, 17 Conn. App. 165, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 471 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).

550 A.2d 1101 (Farmington River Watershed Ass'n v. Pac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DelVecchio v. Department of Income Maintenance
555 A.2d 1007 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1989)
Farmington River Watershed Ass'n v. Pac
554 A.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1989)