Farmers Union Warehouse, Storage Co. v. Stewart

75 S.E. 1131, 138 Ga. 733, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 677
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 27, 1912·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

A case was referred to an auditor, who made his report. Exceptions of law and fact were filed thereto. The court overruled all the exceptions of law, and all exceptions of fact except one, which was sustained. Upon the report and brief of evidence as amended by the ruling sustaining the exception of fact, the court awarded a nonsuit. The plaintiff moved for a new trial, complaining that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. The motion was amended by the addition of two grounds, the first of which was disapproved and the last approved by reference to the record, which disproved the recital of fact. Held, that, inasmuch as the grant of a nonsuit is not reviewable by motion for new trial (Buchanan v. James, 134 Ga. 475 (68 S. E. 72)), there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Eoan. Eockdale superior court. December 31, 1910. A. C. & J. H. McCalla, for plaintiff. J. B. Irwin and J. E. & L. F. McClelland, for defendant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmers Union Warehouse, Storage Co. v. Stewart, 75 S.E. 1131, 138 Ga. 733, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 677 (Ga. 1912).

75 S.E. 1131 (Farmers Union Warehouse, Storage Co. v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
130 S.E.2d 615 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Hartsfield Co. v. Kitchens
179 S.E. 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Rubin v. Hardin
159 S.E. 711 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Holland v. Ryals
152 S.E. 852 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Smith v. Perryman
144 S.E. 341 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Southern Pacific Co. v. DiCristina
137 S.E. 79 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)