Farmers Union Mutual Ins. v. Watt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Farmers Union Mutual Ins. v. Watt

317 S.W.2d 285, 229 Ark. 622, 1958 Ark. LEXIS 546

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedNovember 3, 1958

Docket5-1691

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 317 S.W.2d 285 (Farmers Union Mutual Ins. v. Watt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farmers Union Mutual Ins. v. Watt, 317 S.W.2d 285, 229 Ark. 622, 1958 Ark. LEXIS 546 (Ark. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

Appellees, Cordell L. Watt and his wife, brought suit against appellant, Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Company, on a fire insurance policy covering their dwelling and smokehouse which were completely destroyed by fire, and covering their cellar which was damaged by fire. The complaint contained all the necessary allegations to establish liability. Appellant’s answer consisted of a denial of each and every material allegation in the complaint.

The cause was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellees as prayed. The record contains approximately 20 pages of testimony on behalf of the Watts, 10 pages on behalf of the insurance company, and 6 pages of instructions by the court.

On appeal appellant has not abstracted any of the evidence or any of the instructions. Thus it is seen that appellant has failed to abstract the record as required by Rule 9 (d) of this court.

For the above indicated failure to abstract the record this court must, under the holding in Porter v. Time Stores, Inc., 227 Ark. 286, 298 S. W. 2d 51 and other cases cited therein, affirm the judgment of the trial court, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI