Farmers Tr. Co. v. Egulf, Exrs.

192 A. 653, 326 Pa. 453, 1937 Pa. LEXIS 498
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 10, 1937·No. Appeals, 130 and 165·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The single question raised in these appeals is whether judgment may he entered by default for want of an affidavit of defense in an action in assumpsit brought against the executors of a decedent upon a contract made by him. The court below determined that such a judgment could not be entered. This determination was made before our recent decision in Myers v. Rabinovitz, 326 Pa. 183, was handed down. We there decided that such a judgment is authorized.

The orders of the court are reversed, with directions to reinstate the judgments entered for plaintiffs against defendants for want of an affidavit of defense unless cause to the contrary be shown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmers Tr. Co. v. Egulf, Exrs., 192 A. 653, 326 Pa. 453, 1937 Pa. LEXIS 498 (Pa. 1937).

192 A. 653 (Farmers Tr. Co. v. Egulf, Exrs.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peterman's Estate
56 Pa. D. & C. 365 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1946)
Farmers Tr. Co. v. Alexander (Et Al.)
6 A.2d 262 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Farmers Trust Co. v. Egulf
32 Pa. D. & C. 598 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1938)