Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Farmers State Bank v. Singletary

Farmers State Bank v. Singletary

101 S.E. 541, 24 Ga. App. 537, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 907
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Farmers State Bank v. Singletary. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Ga. App. 653 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 9, 1919·No. 10821·Published

Opinion

Beoyx.es, C. J.

In this case substantial justice seems to have been done; the verdict was authorized by the evidence; no reversible error of law appears to have been committed upon the trial; and for no reason assigned in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial did the court err in overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmers State Bank v. Singletary, 101 S.E. 541, 24 Ga. App. 537, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 907 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

101 S.E. 541 (Farmers State Bank v. Singletary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.