Farmers State Bank v. Singletary

101 S.E. 541, 24 Ga. App. 537, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 907
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 9, 1919
Docket10821
StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.E. 541 (Farmers State Bank v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farmers State Bank v. Singletary, 101 S.E. 541, 24 Ga. App. 537, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 907 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Beoyx.es, C. J.

In this case substantial justice seems to have been done; the verdict was authorized by the evidence; no reversible error of law appears to have been committed upon the trial; and for no reason assigned in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial did the court err in overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 S.E. 541, 24 Ga. App. 537, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-state-bank-v-singletary-gactapp-1919.