Farmers State Bank v. Scott

Supreme Court of Georgia

Farmers State Bank v. Scott

163 S.E. 157, 174 Ga. 481, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 73

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 19, 1932

DocketNo. 8455

StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.E. 157 (Farmers State Bank v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farmers State Bank v. Scott, 163 S.E. 157, 174 Ga. 481, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 73 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This case comes before this court upon exceptions to the grant of an interlocutory injunction. On this question the Justices of this court are equally divided in opinion. Russell, C. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., are for affirmance under the pleadings ahd evidence. Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and G-ilbert, JJ., are for reversal. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This case comes before this court upon exceptions to the grant of an interlocutory injunction. On this question the Justices of this court are equally divided in opinion. Russell, C. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., are for affirmance under the pleadings ahd evidence. Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and G-ilbert, JJ., are for reversal. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed by operation of law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 S.E. 157, 174 Ga. 481, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-state-bank-v-scott-ga-1932.