Farmers State Bank v. Scott

Supreme Court of Georgia

Farmers State Bank v. Scott

163 S.E. 157, 174 Ga. 481, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 73

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 19, 1932·No. No. 8455·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This case comes before this court upon exceptions to the grant of an interlocutory injunction. On this question the Justices of this court are equally divided in opinion. Russell, C. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., are for affirmance under the pleadings ahd evidence. Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and G-ilbert, JJ., are for reversal. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This case comes before this court upon exceptions to the grant of an interlocutory injunction. On this question the Justices of this court are equally divided in opinion. Russell, C. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., are for affirmance under the pleadings ahd evidence. Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and G-ilbert, JJ., are for reversal. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed by operation of law.

Farmers State Bank v. Scott, 163 S.E. 157, 174 Ga. 481, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 73 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

163 S.E. 157 (Farmers State Bank v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.