Farmers State Bank v. Blanchard

206 Ill. App. 323
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 13, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 Ill. App. 323 (Farmers State Bank v. Blanchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farmers State Bank v. Blanchard, 206 Ill. App. 323 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Assignments fob benefit of cbeditobs, § 25*—when evidence insufficient to show consent hy creditor to assignment. On a trial of right of property consisting of stock of goods purchased in bills at a sale from an agent of the debtor, to whom an assignment had been made in trust for the payment of debts, and which was levied upon by a creditor of the debtor, evidence held insufficient to show any consent by the creditor to the arrangement or sale so as to estop it from objecting as to such arrangement or sale. 6. Principal and agent, § 86*—what authority can he given agent. A principal cannot bestow upon the agent any greater authority concerning the subject-matter of the agency than the principal himself had.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardiff Gypsum Plaster Co. v. Hales Coal & Material Co.
239 Ill. App. 16 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 Ill. App. 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-state-bank-v-blanchard-illappct-1917.