Farmers State Bank of Harris v. Webster

South Dakota Supreme Court

Farmers State Bank of Harris v. Webster

229 N.W. 939, 56 S.D. 592, 1930 S.D. LEXIS 47

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 31, 1930

DocketFile No. 6866

StatusPublished

This text of 229 N.W. 939 (Farmers State Bank of Harris v. Webster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farmers State Bank of Harris v. Webster, 229 N.W. 939, 56 S.D. 592, 1930 S.D. LEXIS 47 (S.D. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this action to set aside a conveyance as fraudulent as to creditors, findings and judgment were in favor of plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was made, which, on account of the illness of the judge by whom the case was tried, was heard before another judge. From an order granting the motion, plaintiff appeals.

We have carefully considered the record and the arguments of counsel and are of the opinion that the order appealed from should be, and it is, affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this action to set aside a conveyance as fraudulent as to creditors, findings and judgment were in favor of plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was made, which, on account of the illness of the judge by whom the case was tried, was heard before another judge. From an order granting the motion, plaintiff appeals.

We have carefully considered the record and the arguments of counsel and are of the opinion that the order appealed from should be, and it is, affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 N.W. 939, 56 S.D. 592, 1930 S.D. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-state-bank-of-harris-v-webster-sd-1930.